česky english

Introduction

2  1 


SUPRATECH s.r.o. Laboratory of Physics and Technology

SUPRATECH s.r.o. was established on 21 October 2008 by registration at the Regional Court in Brno under file No. C 60057. At the end of 2012, the company made several discoveries in the field of electrodynamics.



  • About our research

  • What we discovered

  • We use new tools in electrodynamics

  • What we have published and what we are going to publish

  • Well-informed subjects writing about our discoveries

  • We offer a time-limited grant

  • Investment partner




    • About our research.

    The company's initial task was to conduct applied research, particularly in the field of electrodynamics. One of the company's goals was to design a pure DC engine-generator with parameters that would exceed the commutator DC machines and eliminate the power limitation of AC machines with electronic control. The applied research of a pure DC motor consisted of a laboratory design phase in line with the current theoretical perspective as we understood it at the time, and of the planned stage of providing a design version applicable to the general electrical engineering industry. Various variants of DC machines without brushes and electronics were tested. We were also inspired by existing patents worldwide including a Czech patent, which was already out of date at that time. The final output of our applied research, although we suspected some anomalies, was still surprising. The finding that no variant of a pure DC machine is functional, combined with other previous circumstances, initiated some basic research. Experimental testing of current theoretical electrodynamics has become a priority. This was done with the help of modern technology and ideas and the discovery of the high-temperature superconducting shield from 1987. Finally, the set goals have led to several other discoveries that we would like to turn into economically viable reality.


    What we discovered

    - Capability of influencing the mutual repulsion of electrons by magnetic field. Application in the construction of high-capacity electrical capacitors based on a new physical principle.

    - Macroscopic quantum effect - frequency change as a function of the measurement angle.

    - Design of a pure DC machine (without brushes and electronic components) is technically feasible but no solution can be functional in physical terms.

    - Maxwell's equations are unrealistically general and are replaceable by a more precise level macro-energy concept of the magnetic field. We have therefore proven that the theoretical construction of a general homogeneous field without magnetic axis identification is not physically meaningful. (Identifying the magnetic axis means that we identify the energy correlations.) Maxwell equations pose a paradigm obstacle of the development of electrodynamics.

    - Several forms of electromagnetic warp - direct conversion of electricity into motion impulse without a reaction base. (The reaction base may be, for example, a magnetic rail in linear motors, or a stator in rotary motors. If we wanted to be spectacular, we could write that we discovered a way to realize antigravity.)

    - We found a theoretical macroscopic energy concept and probable relations that mathematically describe the link to Maxwell's equations. (Maxwell's equations are roughly in line with the new concept, with an error of up to 50%, within approximately 67% of all theoretically possible technical solutions. There is an exact match in one group of technical solutions only - these are the most common ones used in practice.)


    We use new tools in electrodynamics.

    We have modified the Faraday's Law as follows: Induction of electrical voltage only occurs to its full extent if the conductor is oriented co-linearly with the energy equipotential magnetic field levels and moves crosses them. This is the case in most technical and experimental solutions. This special case technically implies a penetration with a virtual magnetic flux. If the conductor moves along the equipotential levels and does not pass through them, induction does not occur. In the Faraday generator, the shortest conductive path connecting the peripheral and central brushes is extended in a spiral pattern due to the brush sliding on the disc. This happens across energy equipotential levels of the magnetic field. Thus, free electrons acquire a DC drift. (This is analogous to the effect of winding the conductor onto a circular magnet, which induces voltage and current.)

    We have modified the Ampere's Law as follows: The Ampere's force, as defined in the textbooks, only affects the current conductor in its entirety if the current conductor is co-linear with energy equipotential levels of the magnetic field. If this condition is met, the current conductor will move towards or away from the magnetic axis in its full force range. If the axis of the current conductor is perpendicular to the energy equipotential levels, it will only be subjected to moment forces, which preferentially rotate the current conductor so as to intersect as little energy levels of the magnetic field as possible. These moment forces cause a continuous deflection of the disk circumference with respect to the brush in the Faraday DC motor. (Rotation of the Faraday disk can be therefore explained, in terms of force, as a case of two interacting current conductors.)

    The macroscopic energy concept, as a tool for new technical solutions of direct conversion of electromagnetic energy into motion impulse without reaction base, without expulsion of matter.


    What we have published and what we are going to publish

    In the report here, we published the basics of the new energy concept of electrodynamics. We are going to publish a monograph named Extra-terrestrial electrodynamics. In its four chapters, we will show e.g. the following points of interest: an experiment in which the magnetic flux does not change and yet voltage and current are induced in the conductor; a force-based analysis of the Faraday DC motor that reveals the "mnemonics" of modern electrodynamics; an experiment in which we will absorb the same magnetic flux by shielding with the same magnitude but the results of the induced voltage will be different; and other topics including experiments with electromagnetic warp. We plan to hold a press conference to present the electromagnetic warp to the public.


    Well-informed subjects writing about our discoveries

    -The NATURE magazine published a paper describing and unsuccessful experiment, which was supposed to prove the validity of current electrodynamic concept. The report proposed a new macroscopic energy concept explaining this experimental failure of Maxwell's concept based on the continuity equation. The paper was rejected with the reason that they are more interested in publishing papers from areas that are more attractive for readers.

    - Czech Technical University in Prague was acquainted with an older version of the paper (we did not have a macro energy concept yet at that time) in which we pointed out and proved that no PHG / PHM patented anywhere in the world could work. We called upon the Dean of CTU to let anyone at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering (FEL) prove that we are wrong by demonstrating a functional machine in the sense of PHG/PHM (we have provided patent numbers across the world plus one PV in the Czech Republic).

    - We approached an active professor at Masaryk University in Brno to comment on the experiment (video here) and explain how the induced voltage is zeroed when the magnetic induction lines actually bypass the superconducting shield. His response was obligatory. It resulted in the invalidation of the technical application of superconducting shields and in the same global view of both patent applicants and patent officers.

    - We have also contacted other associate professors and professors who are highly competent in the subject matter. No one attempted to interpret the experiment with a clear solution. Answers that contradicted relativistic explanations, pointing to physical creativity, helped us better configure other demonstration devices.

    - We informed the current Chair of ASCR about our most important discovery and asked her to provide us, through specialized experts (such as the Center of Higher Science and others), with information about their majority opinion on the failure of the experiment, which was supposed to prove the validity of the Faraday's Law for homogenized magnetic field. The communication of the Czech Academy of Sciences towards us was rather avoidant, which we briefly analyzed on justice.cz with a copy on our web here.

    Following our previous promotion activities, a prominent patent applicant from Colombia, who held a USA patent for a machine in the sense of PHG/PHM, contacted us by e-mail. In his email, he informed us that the technical implementation of his patent revealed an anomaly: the machine was inoperative.

    We offer a time-limited grant


    The reward amounted to CZK 1,000,000 minimum + CZK 200,000 for documented costs and was to be granted to the first person to demonstrate a functional machine in the sense of PHG/PHM..


    Investment partner

    We are considering collaboration with an investment partner interested in investing in patents in the US, EU, Japan and other countries.






    News

    5  4  3  2  1 


    We are working on the publication of an experimental and mathematical demonstration of how a defined constant can make false theoretical conclusions in electrodynamics quite plausible, underpinning them with relatively large set of experimental data. An analysis will be published, showing why Sir James Clerk Maxwell made a physical mistake when he was trying to create a simple, generally applicable mathematical description of electrodynamics. Among other topics, the paper will reveal the “physical trickster” hidden in Faraday's generator, which leads to the false impression that the Lorentz force is a product of the movement of a conductor in a radially homogeneous field.

    You can learn much more in the experimental lectures in our offering.


    The main driver for the verification of Maxwell equations consisted in the doubts that the electrical intensity generated in a large enclosed conductive loop could “be interested” in a change of homogeneous induction flux somewhere in the centre of the area enclosed by that loop. We see it as physically doubtable that the movement of a conductor in this homogeneous field represents an equivalent result and that this mathematical conformity (Stokes’ theorem) represents a general physical law.
    You can learn more in the fifth paragraph in the “Motivation” section.


    At the academic lectures held within the basic physics programme, you will learn that in a conductor, which is in uniform linear motion, a DC voltage is induced (Faraday's generator is considered as evidence).
    This would mean, indeed, that such a conductor could perform labour without slowing down its motion if we were able to utilize this voltage. In Maxwell's equations, electrically neutral conductor is handled in the same manner as it was made of a glass tube filled with electrons (Biot-Savart-Laplace law). The emergence of electrical intensity in an electrically neutral conductor is thus explained in a manner based on the description of the motion of a separate electron without considering the external environment of the conductor.

    Within our research, we have come to the conclusion that there is an apparent experimental coincidence, which is only caused by the methodology of definition of physical constants, which includes certain physically incorrect aspects. We have proven that what applies to separate electron does not apply equivalently for electrons inside a conductor, which is masking their charge.


    Why are we interested in the interaction between the surrounding magnetic field and conductor and not in the changes in the induction flux?

    You can find the experimental proof that the academic notion is not based on actual data as well as the answer to the previous question in the “Demonstration” in the second paragraph.