česky english

New discoveries in electrodynamics can change our society.

New discoveries in the field of electrodynamics will undoubtedly result in a massive drop in investment in nuclear research. The attitude to this research will be, in terms of power self-sufficiency, much more sceptical. Nuclear enthusiasts will lack arguments for justification of the efficiency of this expensive research field (the current arguments include e.g.: use of nuclear fusion in future power plants, use of Higgs boson to master gravity... and there certainly are much more... As for the first argument, it will be probably easier to use the already existing super-plant - the Sun. The second argument mentioned above is rather interesting then realistic. It is quite similar as trying to understand the origins of life on the Earth by installing a huge cannon on the Moon to bombard the Earth). Governments as well as enterprises will redirect their investment in new technologies, which will be related to both military and civil utilization of high-capacity units and electromagnetic warp. The consequences for the economics will be substantial. Especially the power engineering sector will exploit the possibility of accumulation of power from alternative sources (sun, wind, tide etc.) to a large extent. We could rather say that the power engineering sector will face the greatest transformation (or crisis) of all times due to the diversification of power storage in relatively small modules. Individual end consumers will be able e.g. to store solar power. This will result in a gradual decrease of importance of distribution systems.

In the context of physical history, new theories represented a generalization of previous theories. On the other hand, an old theory was a special case of a newer one. The discovery of electromagnetic warp, however, brings electrodynamics to an unprecedented situation. Maxwell's equations will be narrowed down to a heterogeneous magnetic field. This process will be remarkable thanks to the fact that the heterogeneity of the field allows abandoning the Euclidean notion with immanent magnetic field in such an idealized space. This narrowing allows to consider the space as a physical entity with specific geometrical properties cause by magnetism. It allows spatial work in 4D. The discovery that the science could have lived in a long-term blunder due to a general mathematical and academic tradition and scientific culture, leads us to the conclusion that there will be certain changes in the educational system. The area will be dominated by alternative instruction methods laying stress on individual creativity with minimum levels of memorizing. The main stress will be laid on the ability of effective search for information necessary for resolution of given problem. The contribution of information technology and, subsequently, of simulation systems to the description of physical phenomena will increase and these systems will be continuously updated (at present, something similar is on the way e.g. in meteorology, cosmology etc.). Academic education will be probably shorter and, in the end, replaced with practical instruction with direct involvement in teams and workplaces dependent mostly on their results and economical aspects of their work.

In relatively distant future, the development of power accumulation technology will overcome several turning points, resulting in an essential transformation in the economic environment. Other consequences will include a different view of production, productivity and employment. Preference of sustainable development in combination with purposefulness and profit will no longer be considered as vanity. The regulatory provisions for free entrepreneurship will be mostly dominated by environmental criteria. The changes mentioned above will also influence the overall view of the purpose of education and belief. At present, the long-term globalized educational system results in an excessive emphasis on employment and personal career and unintentional suppression of the importance of family. There will be essential changes in the philosophy of life. The area of belief will not be strictly categorized in individual religious systems. These will gradually merge in meta-systems, characterized by individual view of faith in itself.

At the first sight, the last three paragraphs seem to be too futuristic, without any relation to electrodynamics. Nevertheless, we must not forget that the changes in the generation, accumulation and transformation of power are of great importance for the future model of human society. Let us recall the history of relevant discoveries.

News

5  4  3  2  1 


The properties of micro-world are manifested in the macro-world more than we have thought so far.
They do not vanish; they just change their forms, waiting for being discovered. This is why we have decided to include the preparation of the previously advised report on the direct evidence that a change in magnetic flux is a weak condition for electromagnetic induction into our monograph, not earlier. Another reason consists in the large amount of data and evidence beyond the scope of a brief report. If anybody is interested in preparing such a report, we can lend them a bench tester of homogenized magnetic field. Instead of this report, we shall publish an updated version of the existing report (evidence using the development of the Lorentz force is strong enough), which will clarify the physical causes why induction cannot develop in homogeneous or homogenized magnetic field. In the updated report, the mathematical procedure is even more adapted to Maxwell's equations, thus clarifying why these equations have so long been resistant to any revisions predicted by the quantum physics:
In general, you will find that this is due to the fact that most of the design solutions for invoking induction or the opposite phenomenon are, in physical terms, in an area not allowing the revelation of other properties of the magnetic field thanks to various symmetries and technological feasibility. Easily feasible technical solutions used so far, which only use non-homogeneous magnetic field, do not provide complete information.
In other words: we have not settled for the academic reductionism or mathematical inductions. Our methods are predominantly deductive and experimental. Thanks to these methods, we have succeeded in simulating the homogeneous magnetic field, discovering the fact that the current theoretical conclusions of electrodynamics are not generally applicable. In the updated report, we will conclude that the micro-world properties are manifested in the macro-world much more than we have thought so far.

The fact that patent offices worldwide are mistaken in their decision-making could result in revaluation of the official theoretical platform. In the spring of 2017, we offered to the CTU Prague's Dean, through the data box, the possibility for all employees of the Faculty of Electrical Engineering to gain a reward from a motivation account. This call invoked no response at all. Nevertheless, a mere demonstration of a functional model of some of the patented pure generators /pure motors (to offer rental or purchase of the actual product, we provided the patent numbers and references to the authors in the call). The current balance of this account is provided here. On top of this amount, there is another CZK 200,000 to cover overhead costs. The original text of the call is available on this link.
We will strive to present our experiments systematically in the media. We would like to ask other people to contribute to this refundable motivation account. At present, we definitely know that no one will we able to demonstrate any (patented) model of PHG / PHM; the only purpose of contributing to this account is to discredit the current approach to electrodynamics and, therefore, scientific conservatism. For more information click here.




Considerations on mathematical and physical logic, part 2:
A young doctoral student came with a splendid example of the vast gap between the mathematical and physical logic: “All excavators in your living room are blue.” Is this a true statement? 99.99% of the population immediately answer: It is a false statement as no excavator can fit in most living rooms. Some people will see it as a tricky question. There are very few people, who will know that the statement is true in mathematical terms. Moreover, any statement over an empty set is true in general. We can say anything about certain set until the moment we find that it is not empty. The physical logic is on the side of the overwhelming majority and, by this logic, anybody must object that the statement does not make sense. That means that a physicist thinks of things, about which they can assume that they belong to some non-empty set of interest. Mathematicians think about anything regardless the fact whether the object of interest as any real basis. A mathematician stresses soundness and completeness, while a physicist should not aim at completeness and closeness at all. A physicist can only approach the actual truth. Once a physicist starts to try to find some closeness and completeness, in which they can succeed, they are in danger that this truth will be mathematically popular in general. This is the trap, into which current official electrodynamics has fallen. It has not changed for 150 years. The author of the basic equations of electrodynamics became a celebrity. Any progress was stopped. It is quantum physics, which is revealing those contradictions between the traditional and quantum electrodynamics. Many academics explain these contradictions using a shortcut, which appears to be true: In the macro-world, all the quantums disappear. The previous sentence represents a statement over an empty set. Nobody has a clue, what this set of failing factors looks like, and yet many people resort to such reductions. However, nothing disappears. Similarly to the open space, where astronomers discover relicts bringing information on the past and structure, in electrodynamics - that is, in our laboratory - we discover macro forms of energy levels. As a conclusion, we come to a practical statement: Statements over an empty set or a set, on which we know nothing, are sterile in physical terms.